Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Has the criteria for facial beauty always been the same?

like from way in the past to now, has it changed? are different features now universally/ commonly considered attractive, or has it always basically been the same? i'm always told i'm pretty and georgeous and beautiful, but i have a chubby round face, small almond cshaped hazel eyes, and a tiny nose. with normal sized even lips, and thick almost black loosely curly hair. i'm pretty pale and i'm barely 5'3 and built small. is that classic beauty? i dont think so, so why does everyone, even strangers, comment on my beauty? i have so many questions o this topic, can some one try and answer these questions plus any other info they have about this kind of stuff? thanks.Has the criteria for facial beauty always been the same?
it doesnt matter on the hair color, eyes, skin, thin or thicker, big small lips, rouad or oval face- if your pretty your pretty. there are so many beautiful people out there and all have different or opposite facial features. Being beautiful doesnt need to be something specific. Im brunette hair and eyes, tan and tiny and keep getting complimented from people while this other girl i know who is redhead blonde and tall gets complimented too.Has the criteria for facial beauty always been the same?
basically the same but different things can change about it-





the features are basically the same but sometimes things like color- hair color, pale skin or tan skin, thinner or fatter, etc change and become more desirable at any given point in history but other than that it remains the same.
the new consensuses is that all people are 99.9% the same and all genetically related


also their is a saying the beauty is in the eyes of the beholder
Symmetry has a lot to do with general consensus of beauty. It just seems to be naturally more pleasing when things are symmetrical. It's speculated that we're instinctively looking for someone who is a 'healthy breeder'. In other words, we see the symmetry in someones face as an indicator of them having 'good' genes to pass to the offspring --so we find them more attractive. Now, i don't know how true all that is, but there's a thought for you.

No comments:

Post a Comment